• Coup attemt aftermath
    AboutConfiscationsDecreesOHAL CommissionState of emergency
  • Gladio B Turkey
    About Gladio B in TurkeyJames Corbett about GladioPaul L Williams about GladioSibel Edmonds about Gladio BThe Susurluk scandalOp. Gladio documentary BBC
  • Gülen Movement
    About the Gülen MovementAbout Hanefi AvcıConservative or moderate?Documents and reportsFethullah GulenFETÖGulens intentionsGulen and jihadPersons- Leading figuresStratfor about the MovementStructure The "12 Wise Men"TerrorThe CIA connectionThe Imam's ArmyUS CablesVideos
  • Humen rights
    Human Rights Watch report 2020 TurkeyTurkey 2019 human rights reportReligious freedom reportTorture and ill-treatment
  • Media in Turkey
    About media in TurkeyJournalists in troubleMedia outlets shut downSocial mediaWho controls the media?
  • New Turkey
    Abductions in New TurkeyAbout "The New Turkey"Brain drain in New TurkeyPrisons in New TurkeyTorture in New Turkey
  • Purges
    About purges in TurkeyAcademics for peaceCHP deputiesGülen movementHDP deputiesLawyers in TurkeyMedia in Turkey
  • Sources
  • Terror attacks 2015-19
Web Page Creator
Web Page Creator
 

[Eurasia] Uzbekistan Intel Collected

[Eurasia] Uzbekistan Intel Collected

Released on 2013-05-27 00:00 GMT

Email-ID

1791736

Date

2010-10-03 23:39:03

From

lauren.goodrich@stratfor.com

To

eurasia@stratfor.com

[Eurasia] Uzbekistan Intel Collected


CODE: UZ102, UZ104, UZ106
PUBLICATION: yes
ATTRIBUTION: STRATFOR sources in Washington/Taskent
SOURCE DESCRIPTION: Uzbek Diplomat, Uzbek Political Secretary, Uzbek DCM
SOURCE RELIABILITY: C
ITEM CREDIBILITY: 2
DISTRIBUTION: Analysts
HANDLER: Lauren

KYRGYSTAN

Kyrgyzstan is the top priority for the Uzbek government. It is no secret that Russia was behind what happened in Kyrgyzstan. Russia could have simply taken the north/capital and swung the country back into its control. As soon as violence moved south - especially to Osh-it became obvious that it had nothing to really do with Kyrgyzstan, but Uzbekistan. Russia was testing Uzbekistan.

It has been a large discussion in Central Asia whether Uzbekistan had the ability to stand up to Russia or not. For years, Uzbekistan had the ability to remain independent from Russia as long as NATO was interested in the region. But now that NATO has no interest in the region really anymore, Russia feels more free to move.

So, Russia tested Uzbekistan in the Kyrgyz revolution. Uzbekistan moved troops to the border and there was a few hours that Uzbekistan considered going into southern Kyrgyzstan to protect their Uzbek populations there. Karimov called Medvedev with no answer. It was that time that it became known that Russia sent in paratroopers into Kyrgyzstan. It felt as if
Uzbekistan could have been possibly being pulled into a Georgia scenario.

So Uzbekistan stopped its plans for going into Kyrgyzstan.

The Uzbek population in Kyrgyzstan is different than the Uzbeks in Uzbekistan proper. They are much more religious and would not be really accepted back in Uzbekistan. But this does not mean that Tashkent is okay with the genocide against the Uzbeks there, like occurred during the
revolution.

OTHER ISSUES

-Uzbekistan won't join any movement overall - such as remaining faithful to the CSTO. It is looking for a bilateral group instead. For example, it wants bilateral agreements with Russia, not a CSTO agreement because it gives Russia a blanket excuse to go in without the guidelines of the bilateral.

-The population in Ferghana is weak. It is poor, unorganized and with no real way to push up against the government. This is not a concern.

KAZAKHSTAN

The top priority is for Uzbekistan to not join any organization in which Kazakhstan will have a large or overarching role.

CHINA

Russia and China work very well together in Central Asia. Beijing does run everything by Moscow in the region. Every Central Asian government knows
this.

AFGHANISTAN

The Uzbek government has worked with whoever is in power in Afghanistan. It really doesn't matter if it is Karzai or the Taliban. Tashkent has already been in talks with both sides on supplying more electricity and going in with construction projects in Afghanistan. 

In Afghanistan, the numbers of Uzbeks and Tajiks are doubted. Yes they are there, yes they are elite fighters that are most likely the best trained and equipped. The interesting thing is that there are quite a few younger generation that has signed onto the resistance in Afghanistan that are incredibly educated and trained up. They are starkly different than the typical Taliban in Afghanistan.

But none of that population will be accepted back home. The Uzbek and Tajik populations in Afghanistan have become too radicalize and religiously idealized to have any safe haven back home. There is NO group in either Uzbekistan or Tajikistan that will have them back. Instead there have been quite a few villages and communities in Waziristan that are Uzbek for them to settle in. Also, the border isn't so porous or ill defined for a large group to cross. Can a few get through - of course, but
it isn't an entire cell.

TAJIKISTAN / IRAN

The Tajiks are enemy #1. Period. They are the largest concern and the one country Tashkent watches the closest.

There is a concern Russia could use the Tajik population (whether the regular population or the militants) against Uzbekistan.

The next concern is Iran's influence in Tajikistan. It is somewhat strong, but Tehran could easily move to make it stronger. This is why Uzbekistan and Iran do not get along. Also why Uzbekistan was staunchly against Iran in the SCO - even as a side associate.

It is possible that Iran could try to make a grab for Tajikistan as revenge against Russia, but it would take A LOT for them to pull this off. Moreover, Russia has been locking down the country to ensure Iran could
never do this.

TURKEY / GULEN

Turkey is weak and has no place in Central Asia. Turkey would never attempt to move into Central Asia without Russia's permission.

Gulen moved in at breakneck speed in the early 2000s. They set up an incredible amount of NGOs, small businesses, but were mainly involved in lyceums. This was considered some of the best education that anyone could get inside of Uzbekistan. Moreover, those that graduated the Gulen-funded lyceums were the top educated in the entire country

Via the lyceums, they ended up setting up libraries and internet cafes. This was incredibly new to Uzbeks.

Then the Gulens then moved into an Uzbek opposition movement called Norci. This infuriated the estblishment. This is when the government moved against the Gulen movement because it wasn't just affecting the social scene in Uzbekistan, but the political scene. The Uzbek government in 2001 started shutting down the schools, libraries, cafes, businesses, NGOs.

But the interesting thing is that anyone who attended any Gulen lyceum is now blacklisted in Uzbekistan. There was even a roundup in 2007-2009 of any Uzbek who attended those lyceum and worked in an important job near or in the government by the Uzbeks.

The Turks now have NO influence in the country. Their plan was foiled.

--
Lauren Goodrich
Senior Eurasia Analyst
STRATFOR
T: 512.744.4311
F: 512.744.4334
lauren.goodrich@stratfor.com
www.stratfor.com

Source

To the top



Human Rights Watch country report:
Events in Tyrkey 2020



Council of Europe anti-torture Committee
publishes two
reports on Turkey



Black Sites in Turkey


Advocates of silenced
Turkey report 2020

About Some sources Gladio B: Gulen & CIA.
Abduction/ missing persons. Brain drain Torture