The new Turkey |
---|
22-aug-20 |
Date?? The Small Wars Journal has published two articles by the author. After publication of the first article, “Who Was Behind the July 15 Uprising in Turkey,” a British tourist who stayed at Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s hotel on the night of the July 15, 2016, coup attempt reached out to the author. The tourist’s contributions, which were published in the second SWJ article, “Dark Points in the July 15 Military Uprising: Was President Erdogan Really at the Hotel?,” shed light on whether Erdogan had stayed at the hotel until late at night on July 15. After the second article was published, several Turkish Air Force Academy (AFA) cadets who witnessed the unsuspecting involvement of fellow cadets in the coup attempt reached out to the author and shared their experiences and knowledge. The AFA cadets witnessed what they described as “the creepiest events” of the July 15 coup attempt. The cadets, who were unaware that they had entered one of the hot spots of the coup attempt, paid huge costs. Members of unknown jihadist and paramilitary groups lynched one cadet and used Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terrorist organization’s tactic to behead another.[1] The cadets were caught in the crossfire between so-called amateurish plotters[*] (SAP) and well-prepared counter-coup plotters (CCP). Both sides had planned to involve the cadets in the coup attempt, but the actions of the CCPs resulted in the brutal killing of the two cadets and the arrest of 442 other cadets. In the history of military coups in Turkey, cadets occasionally were exploited by coup plotters. For example, one of the May 27, 1960, coup plotters, Military Academy Commander Talat Aydemir, made two unsuccessful coup attempts with cadets a year later. The cadets were prosecuted in 1963, and 75 out of 293 cadets were sentenced to four years in prison. The remaining 218 cadets were acquitted.[2] Some of these cadets from the early 1960s, in contrast to the cadets exploited for the July 15 coup attempt, intentionally participated in the coup. The cadets who were exploited in the July 15 coup attempt, however, paid a heavier price for their unintentional involvement. Two of them paid with their lives. The others lost their chance for an education and a career, were labeled as traitors, and were imprisoned on the basis of scant evidence that included unanswered and contradictory statements from Air Force commanders who were part of CCPs. This article, using interviews with former air force cadets who experienced the events on July 15,[3] examines how Turkish military cadets were involved in the July 15 coup attempt. What Happened at the Air Force Academy Training Camp? The AFA cadets were at the summer military camp, when the coup attempt took place in the province of Yalova, 60 miles southeast of Istanbul, on July 15, 2016. The cadets were transferred from the military camp to various locations in Istanbul. One of the cadets who was at the military camp in the early hours of the coup attempt spoke about being suspicious of the cadets’ commanders. This respondent talked about one commander in particular, then Commander of Air Forces Abidin Unal, saying:
As specified in the author’s first SMJ article, Unal seems to be one of the most active members of the CCPs. He knew about the coup attempt before it happened but did nothing to protect his personnel, the cadets, out of harm’s way. It remains unclear what motivated Unal to place the training-camp cadets in the middle of gunfire as the coup attempt unfolded. The respondent continued, saying:
The nine buses left at 12:07 a.m. on July 16. It was treacherous to let these students be part of the coup at this hour, because the coup failed around 11 p.m. on July 15 when the SAPs’ attempt was foiled. A police car was parked in front of the military camp and, despite having known that the coup attempt had failed at around 11 p.m. on July 15[10] did nothing to prevent the buses from leaving the camp. The respondent continued, saying:
The cadets who stayed at the military camp were under the command of a newly graduated lieutenant. One of the respondents gave details about what happened the cadets who were waiting at the camp:
The cadets who had left the military training camp were sent to five locations in Istanbul. Two buses went to the Bosporus Bridge, three buses went to Sultanbeyli district (located inland on the Asian side of Istanbul), two buses went to Orhanli (a town on the Asian side of Istanbul), and two buses went to the Fatih Sultan Mehmet (FSM) Bridge in Istanbul. In addition to those cadets, 37 others were taken to the Digi Turk media outlet in Istanbul. What Happened in Sultanbeyli and Orhanli? When the buses transporting the cadets reached Sultanbeyli, the road was blockaded. The cadets learned about the ongoing coup attempt from people who had gathered near the stopped buses. The cadets told the onlookers that they were students and that they had not participated in the coup attempt. The crowd then grew quiet. One of the police officers at the scene explained to the crowd that the cadets did not know what was going on. When the cadets joined the crowd in reciting the Turkish national anthem, the onlookers appeared to believe that the cadets had not been involved in the coup attempt. The police, however, did not let the cadets to leave the scene until early the next morning, even though the crowd had dispersed. The confrontation began when several provocateurs gathered around the buses, stoned the vehicles and tried to lynch the cadets.[13] Two other buses were stopped at the Orhanli toll road checkpoint where the road had been blockaded, leaving the buses and the cadets onboard stuck between a crowd of onlookers and police officers. When the cadets and their commanders got off the buses, a group of people armed with long-rifle automatic weapons and positioned on a lower hill began shooting at the cadets and commanders. The ambushed cadets fled back onto the bus to protect themselves from the onslaught. One of the video recordings of the confrontation confirmed the statements of the respondents. At 45 seconds into the video, an unidentified individual can be seen shooting in the dark, targeting the crowd and the cadets immediately after the cadets got off the buses.[14] What Happened on the Bosporus Bridge? Two other buses transporting the cadets to Istanbul were stopped and attacked by a crowd on the Bosporus Bridge, which connects the Asian and European continents.[16] The attackers broke the front window of one of the buses and hurled incendiaries at the vehicle’s gas tank in an attempt to detonate the bus. Some cadets were forced to get off the bus and were lynched. The crowd then took the cadets an area of the bridge where soldiers assigned to the location by SAPs had congregated to blockade the one-way road over the bridge. Figure 1: Photograph of the cadet who was beheaded on the Bosporus Bridge on July 15, 2016.[17] It should be noted that one of the civilians killed on the Bosporus Bridge was Erol Olcak and his son. Olcak was a close friend of Erdogan. According to the government’s theory, Olcak and his son were killed by SAPs. Olcak’s wife, however, dared to question the suspicious killing of her ex-husband and son. She stated that the SAP soldiers on the bridge were accused with scant evidence against them and noted, “When I went to the bridge in the early mornings of July 16, the bridge was washed and cleaned. All the evidence was wiped off. I am dubious about the report of the Forensics. I can disinter my son for further examination.[18] Who Targeted Air Force Cadets in Ankara? It seems that the CCPs made a detailed plan to target all of the cadets at the Air Force Academy. On July 15, for example, a small group of junior cadets were in Ankara for parachute training and stayed at the Military Academy guesthouse. The cadets were unaware, however, that the CCPs had something else in mind for the guesthouse visitors. One of the cadets in Ankara in that day described the events that took place on July 15, saying:
Then we began to wait for the buses in the ceremony area with our luggage. The plan was to reach out to the air base and then to fly to Istanbul to arrive our school’s military training camp. Two helicopters landed around 4 a.m., and the lieutenant colonel directed us to board the helicopters. However, the captain wanted to ask it to regiment commander, and he did not let us board the helicopter. The helicopters were able to transfer 91 cadets until 5 a.m., and they did not come back. So, we, the remaining 51 cadets, stayed at the guesthouse 12 days. Two prosecutors visited us on July 24 and took the statements of two of our friends. They told us that there was nothing to make us worried. We were interestingly detained and handcuffed on July 27. The police always kept us handcuffed along six days until we were arrested. It is not clear what roles the cadets’ commanders played in the suspicious activity that occurred in Istanbul and Ankara. It seemed that a few commanders at the academy were members of SAPs and made a plan to exploit the cadets. In the trials that ensued after military raids on Turkish media outlets, the judge and prosecutor asked the academy’s regiment commander why he sent the cadets to Digi Turk media outlet in Istanbul. The commander’s answers were not credible.[23] Why Were the Cadets Targeted? It seems that the SAPs and the CCPs planned to involve cadets in confrontations. The CCPs, for example, calculated that the cadets would return fire when they were ambushed by intelligence unit-controlled jihadist groups and paramilitary groups.[24] The cadets, however, did not respond as expected. They did not shoot back at their attackers even though their restraint put them at risk of losing their lives.[25] If the cadets had been coup plotters, then they most likely would have returned fire, killing some of people involved in the nighttime coup attempt.[26] According to some respondents’ comments, the cadets were the weakest and most impressionable target because they were not able to question the directives of their superiors.[27] The SAPs and CCPs were confident that these cadets would obey all directives without asking any questions. The CCPs, moreover, knew that implicating the cadets as active participants in the coup would be a plausible pretext for the government to shut down all military schools.[28] The plan worked as intended. Who Killed the Civilians on the Bosphorus and FSM Bridges? A significant number of the casualties that occurred during the July 15 confrontation on the Bosporus Bridge were civilians as a result of Erdogan’s invitation them to the public spaces. According to Turkey’s Armed Forces, 8,651 of the SAPs were members of the country’s military force. That number represents only 1.5 percent of Turkey’s entire military force. A very limited number of warplanes, tanks, and warships were deployed. Many people were killed or wounded at all of the locations where the cadets’ buses stopped. Forty people were killed—but not at the hands of the cadets, all of whom fired no bullets.[30] If the cadets are blameless, then who were the perpetrators? According to some of the comments provided to the author, the jihadist groups under the control of Turkish government intelligence units and several paramilitary groups were the dark hands targeting the cadets and innocent civilians. Jihadist Groups The Turkish government’s policies on Syria created a favorable environment for jihadist groups linked to Al-Qaida and ISIS to flourish. Many international media outlets have reported that these jihadists cross over the Turkish border to enter Syria. Other evidence on the dark relationship between the Turkish government and jihadists groups comes from two police investigations. The first investigation was of an incident that occurred in February of 2014. Buses filled with weapons and ammunition were stopped by Turkish military personnel. ![]() Figure 2: Jihadist groups with the body of a cadet they lynched and killed on July 15.[31] Paramilitary Groups The other likely perpetrator is comprised of two paramilitary groups: SADAT (International Defense Consulting) and ASDER (Adaleti Savunanlar Dernegi, or Association for Those Supporting the Justice). These paramilitary groups have been tasked with protecting the Erdogan regime in case the military force fails in its duty to ensure the president stays in power. SADAT and ASDER are seen as alternative protectors of the Erdogan regime. SADAT has provided training programs to opposition groups in Syria. The director of the SADAT is an advisor to Erdogan.[32] Many rumors name SADAT as the perpetrator of suspicious homicides in Turkey. ![]() Figure 3: The killing of the cadets by masked paramilitary groups. The photograph was captured from a video taken at the scene of the incident on the Bosphorus Bridge on July 15, 2016.[34] How Were the Cadets Prosecuted? In the early morning of July 16, all of the cadets were detained. Groups of at least 120 cadets were packed into rooms built for a maximum capacity of 40 persons. They were given a scant amount of water and food. When they were escorted to the bathrooms, they were beaten harshly by police officers. The cadets appeared before a judge in the fourth day of their detention. The judge listened to only one cadet before sending all of the cadets to Silivri Prison in Istanbul to serve a life sentence. Conditions at the prison were harsh. In court, it was proved that the cadets—based on ballistics examinations—did not use their weapons. The lawyer of beheaded cadet presented strong evidence on 15 people who became involved in the killing of cadets, but the prosecutor replied to the lawyer, “There is nothing to do, and do not create problems and burn us.”[35] The court, however, did not investigate the perpetrators who killed the two cadets, despite an abundance of video recordings that clearly documented the perpetrators’ actions. Because the Erdogan government had invoked a state of emergency in response to the coup attempt, even the perpetrators who lynched and beheaded the cadets on the Bosporus Bridge were protected from prosecution. Unanswered Questions
Conclusion The July 15 military coup attempt is full of unanswered questions. The confrontations between SAPs and CCPs yielded results for both sides. The suicidal actions of the SAPs not only landed them in prison but also served as a pretext for the government to crack down on its opponents and make Turkey a more authoritarian country.[†] The CCPs who got support of Erdogan enjoyed keeping their positions. It seems that the SAPs had devised a plan to use the unsuspecting cadets in the coup attempt, given that a group of cadets was transferred to one of the media outlets in Istanbul. At the same time, CCPs used their knowledge of the SAPs’ plan to involve a group of the cadets in the coup attempt and therefore devised a more detailed plan. The CCPs incorporated into their plan every detail on how the cadets would be transferred to various points in Istanbul. It is precisely because so many questions remain unanswered that the government has staged extravagant ceremonies commemorating the government’s ability to defeat the July 15 coup attempt. Erdogan continues to paint a narrative, blaming the Gulenists for the coup attempt and telling the people of Turkey that he had defeated an enemy bent on destroying the government. In his first SWJ article, the author described two group of plotters. The first group was comprised of a small cadre of plotters from ultranationalist, Kurdish, Gulenist, and secular military staff. The author referred them as “so-called amateurish coup plotters” (SAP) who were part of a very badly orchestrated coup attempt. They did not have a coup plan, and their act was like a suicide. End Notes [1] “15 Temmuz Koprude Yakalanan Fetocu,” Youtube, accessed on September 25, 2019, from www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXvuhDGuy5o
[3] This article used qualitative data obtained in open-ended ethnographic interviews. The dataset is comprised of 5 interviews conducted with AFA cadets who experienced the July 15 coup. They were selected through a snowballing technique because it was the best way to find experts on the topic. The respondents voluntarily participated in the research, and each interview lasted three hours. Each respondent stipulated to keep his/her identity confidential. Therefore, each respondent was codified to anonymize his/her identity, using letters and numbers. For instance, AFA1 symbolizes the first cadet and AFA2 is the second cadet.
[4] AFA1 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[5] “Harbiyeli annesi Melek Çetinkaya, tüm bildiklerini Çağlar Cilara’ya anlattı!,” Youtube, accessed on October 25, 2019 from www.youtube.com/watch?v=
[6] Org. Abidin Ünal, 15 Temmuz günü öğrencilere “itaatin önemini anlatmis,”
Grihat, https://grihat.com/org-abidin-unal-15-temmuz- [7] Org. Abidin Ünal, 15 Temmuz günü öğrencilere “itaatin önemini anlatmis,” Grihat, https://grihat.com/org-abidin-unal-15-
[8] AFA3 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[9] AFA3 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[10] “Harbiyeli annesi Melek Çetinkaya, tüm bildiklerini Çağlar Cilara’ya anlattı!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaiBXMk3WHo
[11] “Harbiyeli annesi Melek Çetinkaya, tüm bildiklerini Çağlar Cilara’ya anlattı!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaiBXMk3WHo
[12] AFA2 and AFA8, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[13] “Askeri Darbe Girismi Esir Alinan Askerler Dovuldu,” Youtube, accessed on November 5, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
[14] “Orhanli Giseler Polis Uyarisiz harbiyelilere Ates Ediyor,” Youtube, accessed on October 27, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
[15] AFA1 and AFA3, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[16] “15 Temmuz Boğaziçi Köprüsü - Gelen Jandarma Otobüsü Ve Yaşananlar,” Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
i4NvM-tQC54 [17] https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rgfDRR5yqto/maxresdefault.jpg
[18] “Nihal Olcak’tan Deliller Yetersiz Aciklamasi: Oglumun Mezarini Actirabilirim,” ABC Gazetesi, accessed on December 11, 2019 from www.abcgazetesi.com/canli-yayinda-
nihal-olcok-deliller-yetersiz-aciklamasi- oglunun-mezarini-mi-actiracak-62581. [19] AFA11, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[20] AFA3 and AFA7, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[21] AFA11, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[22] AFA11, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[23] “TRT ve Digiturk Binasini Isgal Girisimi Davasi,” Haberler, accessed on December 9, 2019, from https://www.haberler.com/trt-ve-digiturk-
binasini-isgal-girisimi-davasi-9753978-haberi/. [24] AFA2 and AFA3, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[25] AFA3 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[26] AFA1 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[27] AFA3 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[28] AFA2 and AFA3, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[29] AFA3 and AFA4, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
[30] “Istanbul FSM Koprusundeki Askerler Boyle Dovuldu”, Youtube, accessed on November 17, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjKNRPEJ_io. And “Koprude Askeri Linc Ettiler,” Youtube, accessed on Novemver 3, 2019, fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9UTxCOV21Q
[31] https://galeri14.uludagsozluk.com/771/bogazici-koprusunde-basi-kesilerek-oldurulen-asker_1119003.jpg
[32] SADAT Saray’da, Cumhuriyet, http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/
haber/turkiye/ 585597/SADAT_Saray_da.html [33] ASDER Uyesi Darbesavar Askerler, Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BN9XO2pVbKE
[34] “15 Temmuzda Koprude Yakalanan Fetocu,” Youtube, accessed on November 2, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
PXvuhDGuy5o [35] “Askeri okul ogrencisinin avukati: Savcilik, “Yapilack birsey yok, bizim basimizi yakmayin” Youtube, accessed on December 7, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
ABAoc_nD0P0 [36] Harbiyeli annesi Melek Çetinkaya, tüm bildiklerini Çağlar Cilara'ya anlattı!”
[37] AFA2 and AFA5, Interview by Mahmut Cengiz, Personal Interview-Skype, September 2019.
|
Dr. Mahmut Cengiz is an Assistant Professor and Research Faculty with Terrorism, Transnational Crime and Corruption Center (TraCCC) and the Schar School of Policy and Government. Dr. Cengiz has international field experience where he has delivered capacity building and training assistance to international partners in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. He also has been involved in the research projects for the Brookings Institute, European Union, and various U.S. agencies. |
![]() |